Maybe Not - Rich Hickey
ClojureTV · 14 则 HN 推荐
视频问答
可以让 AI 解释当前片段，或总结整部视频。如果回答附有时间戳，点击即可跳到对应片段。
试着问：这里讲的是什么意思？
需要用 Google 登录。确认前可查看最多会扣除多少积分。
Rich Hickey's Clojure/Conj 2018 keynote argues that Maybe/Option types and rigid type signatures are a poor way to model data that changes over time. He builds the case around optionality, schema growth and compatibility, and presents the ideas behind Clojure spec as an alternative.
HN 推荐的原因： HN commenters send people to it whenever nulls, Maybe/Option or static typing come up, as a thoughtful dissent from the type-system orthodoxy that changes how some people model data.
“Rich Hickey's "Maybe Not" should be watched by anyone who thinks nulls/nils/undefineds are okay.” 阅读 HN 讨论 ↗