28c3: The Science of Insecurity
28c3 · 9 则 HN 推荐
视频问答
可以让 AI 解释当前片段，或总结整部视频。如果回答附有时间戳，点击即可跳到对应片段。
试着问：这里讲的是什么意思？
需要用 Google 登录。确认前可查看最多会扣除多少积分。
Meredith Patterson and Sergey Bratus argue that networked software stays insecure because protocols and inputs are too complex to recognize safely. They propose using formal language theory and grammars to build secure, verifiable input handling.
HN 推荐的原因： HN commenters call it one of the best security talks and the standard introduction to LANGSEC, which they use to argue for simpler, well-specified input formats.
“The best talk on computer security I have seen is Meredith Patterson's Science of Insecurity at 28c3” 阅读 HN 讨论 ↗