Maybe Not - Rich Hickey
ClojureTV · 14 則 HN 推薦
影片問答
可以請 AI 解釋目前片段，或總結整部影片。如果回答附有時間戳記，點選即可跳到對應片段。
試著問：這裡講的是什麼意思？
需使用 Google 登入。確認前可查看最多會扣除多少點數。
Rich Hickey's Clojure/Conj 2018 keynote argues that Maybe/Option types and rigid type signatures are a poor way to model data that changes over time. He builds the case around optionality, schema growth and compatibility, and presents the ideas behind Clojure spec as an alternative.
HN 推薦的原因： HN commenters send people to it whenever nulls, Maybe/Option or static typing come up, as a thoughtful dissent from the type-system orthodoxy that changes how some people model data.
“Rich Hickey's "Maybe Not" should be watched by anyone who thinks nulls/nils/undefineds are okay.” 閱讀 HN 討論 ↗